Questions for Solana homeQuestions for Solana
Curated intake

Propose a record.

Records may be proposed for review when they raise specific, sourced public-interest questions about governance, accountability, transparency, user protection, infrastructure, funding, or public process in the Solana ecosystem.

Intake

Propose a record for review.

Submissions are reviewed before publication. A submission may be edited for clarity, combined with related submissions, deferred, or declined. The aim is to publish clear, sourced, answerable questions, not unsupported claims.

Before submitting, you may want to read the Method, which sets out how records are selected, sourced, reviewed, answered, and closed.

Required

Privacy note: Submissions may be reviewed for possible publication, correction, or follow-up. Contact details are optional and will only be used to contact you about this submission. Contact details will not be published. You can ask for your submission or contact details to be deleted by emailing questions@questionsforsolana.com.

For example: a published policy, an explanation of who has authority, a timeline, a correction, a disclosure, a public statement, an update to a record, or confirmation that no process exists.

Useful sources may include official documents, public statements, governance posts, archived pages, on-chain transactions, dated records, screenshots where necessary, or other material that helps verify the question. Strongly encouraged — submissions with sources are easier to review.

Do not submit: private keys, seed phrases, passwords, confidential material, or anything you do not have permission to share.

Topic area, optional

Select all that apply.

About this submission

These questions help Questions for Solana review submissions fairly and consider whether a right of reply is appropriate. They are part of the editorial process, not a public accusation form.

Disclosure of interest

Do you have any direct interest, relationship, or conflict that may be relevant to this submission?

Disclosures help submissions be reviewed fairly. They do not automatically prevent publication. Where relevant, a disclosed interest may be summarised in a record so readers can understand the context.

Named parties

Does this submission name or materially concern a person, organisation, or project?

Optional review context

The following fields are optional. They help prioritise and contextualise review but are not required to submit.

Who, if anyone, would reasonably be able to answer this question?

Choose the closest description.

Include any relevant context that may help review the submission, such as grants, chapters, employment, partnerships, sponsorships, programs, investments, advisory roles, prior submissions, or other ecosystem relationships.

Publication preference

May the substance of this submission be used in a public record?

Leave an email, X handle, or Telegram if you are happy to be contacted privately about this submission. Contact details will not be published without permission and will only be used in relation to this submission.

What happens next? Submissions may be reviewed, edited for clarity, combined with similar submissions, or declined if they do not fit the public-record standard. Submissions are not automatically published.

Guidelines
What makes a good submission?

A good submission should ask:

  • What process applies?
  • Who has authority?
  • What standard is being used?
  • What public information is missing?
  • What would count as a substantive answer?

Submissions should be specific, factual, and supported by public evidence where possible.

Submissions should not:

  • make unsupported allegations;
  • attack individuals personally;
  • publish private information without permission;
  • ask readers to decide liability;
  • rely on speculation about motives.

Submissions may be edited for clarity, neutrality, and legal/reputational safety before publication.