Released in parts
Questions for Solana is a public record of specific, documented questions about process, governance, infrastructure, and namespace standards in the Solana ecosystem.
Governance. Accountability. User protection.
A public record of questions about governance, accountability, user protection, and ecosystem trust in Solana.
These questions were raised privately before publication. This site preserves the public record.
Question 01 sits at the intersection of Solana Name Service (SNS), .sol domains, ecosystem security, social engineering risk, frozen domains, and user protection.
Questions for Solana is a public record of specific, documented questions about process, governance, infrastructure, and namespace standards in the Solana ecosystem.
Each question is published only when it can be supported from public records, official statements, on-chain data, or attributed material. Some material remains held pending legal and journalistic review.
The aim is to identify the correct forum, ask for the process to be made readable, and ask that decisions affecting users and builders rest on standards anyone can read.
This record does not ask readers to decide liability, award compensation, or intervene in any individual dispute.
Who is the correct forum for disputed .sol name status, and who decides whether a name remains marked, frozen, cleared, transferred, or treated as disputed?
Where can holders and users read the disputed-name process, including how later buyers and marked-name transactions are treated?
What, if any, relationship exists between the current .sol layer and the announced .SOL and .SOLANA route, and what should holders know before any transition?
The incident described in the companion SNS record affected assets including funds intended for the family of a former Solana Foundation colleague.
The questions were raised through Foundation-linked channels before publication.
Formal notices were sent to Foundation operations, press, and legal channels, with retained records used only to establish notice history.
The first published question asks who decides the status of a disputed .sol name and what process or roadmap users can read.
The existing .sol identity layer operated by SNS, the absence of a located public process for disputed-name status, how later buyers are treated, and what, if any, relationship existing .sol names have to the announced .SOL and .SOLANA route.
Read articleAdditional material is held pending legal and journalistic review. It is not published while held, and it is not included in the public review bundle. The open release stands on its own and does not depend on held material.
The first release includes a self-contained public-record bundle and neutral prompt so readers can test the argument without relying on hidden context.
Open bundleThe companion record sets out the public incident and status record for the January SNS matter.
Open companion recordPublic records are easier to ignore when they stay private. They become more useful when they are reviewed, challenged, and shared with people who can help. If you know a lawyer, journalist, researcher, governance specialist, Solana builder, .sol holder, or anyone else who may be able to review this record carefully, you can use the text below to share it.
Any party referenced in a published question is invited to respond. Corrections and clarifications will be reflected publicly where appropriate.
Each release identifies the parties most directly relevant to that question.
Private corrections, clarifications, or right-of-reply correspondence are welcome and will be reflected accurately where appropriate.
Formal email is available at chris@questionsforsolana.com. Telegram and X/Twitter remain available for quick contact.